Terra-Forming the Earth

The First Known Example of Terra-Forming

If you have not read the introductory article, you really should do so before reading
further in this one, as the introductory tome lays foundations which are critical to clarity
and full understanding.  Please read “Exploring the Bible – the Beginning”.

Please keep in mind our goal to reduce some of the misunderstanding and open
hostility which exists on both sides (religion vs. science) and between people of various
religious backgrounds.

Look again at the first two verses of the Bible.  As you may recall from our introduction,
we will be primarily using the Authorized King James Version (KJV), usually enlightened
by a comparison with Young’s Literal Translation (YLT).

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Genesis 1:1-2 (KJV)

1 In the beginning of God’s preparing the heavens and the earth—
2 the earth hath existed waste and void, and darkness is on the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God fluttering on the face of the waters, Genesis 1:1-2 (YLT)

This very clear statement indicates that this Earth and the heavens which surround it
were created by an intelligent being, which we generally refer to as “God”.  Technically,
that word is not a name, but rather a description (as the Bible can be called “Book”).
There are actually numerous names which are applied to Him.  (For the moment, we will
not go there.)

Of course, for the events described in Genesis 1 to be possible, such a being must be
incredibly more complex and powerful than any human.  If you doubt or deny his
existence, please bear with me.  You tolerate all sorts of fantastic concepts in the name
of science, and especially of science fiction.  If you don’t accept scripture as truth, then
treat it (for now) as science fiction!

As this is written, a number of credible scientific minds are focused on exploration of
Mars, and of potential activities which may one day be conducted there by men /
women from Earth.  Included in these concepts are some proposed activities which are
collectively described as “terra-forming”.  This theoretical process amounts to deliberate modification of the environment of an entire planet, for the purpose of making it more hospitable to our sort of life forms.

The people who propose Terra-forming of Mars are not ridiculed by the general scientific community – even though the concept is not universally accepted as “wise”, or even as possible.  If modern scientists are willing to treat the concept of Terra-forming Mars as a legitimate scientific debate, why is it any less credible to suggest that our planet was intentionally Terra-formed?

If Earth was Terra-Formed, Who did it?
Getting back to our text:  “In the beginning, God…”  Why does this seem so repugnant
to so many folks?  Even if the prevailing theories of leading scientists are correct about
the “How”, is it unreasonable to ask, “Who?”

As previously mentioned, “God” is not a name, but rather a description.  It has become, in prevailing Christian circles, the accepted name (nickname?)  by which we refer to the entity who is more correctly known as “Yahweh”, or “Jehovah”.  Yes, technically, the Jehovah’s Witnesses are correct in their insistence on calling Him by His specific name, rather than by a word which actually amounts to a common noun.

Having acknowledged that “God” is not actually the proper name—because it IS the
term which is most commonly used in the KJV, and because it is more or less
universally recognized in the United States, in this series, we will call Him (Jehovah /
Yahweh)  by His prevailing nickname – “God”. You have probably noticed that I even
capitalize the pronouns by which I refer to Him. This should give you a glimpse of MY
attitude toward Him.  Those caps are not accidental, typographical errors!

As we continue through Genesis, you will find that chapter 1 is a brief account of the
Terra-forming and populating of the planet.  Chapter 2 then develops the topics
previously introduced, in greater detail. Don’t be confused by the seeming duplication.
Chapter 2 does not describe a second creation event, but rather fills in details which
were omitted from the first account.

Just to remind you where we are in the process; in the beginning God created the stuff
from which everything on Earth was made.  Before the beginning?  Nothing!  Scientists
debate whether there was an incredibly small, incredibly dense particle – or whether
material was literally created from nothing – maybe a direct transition of energy to
matter?

It is not debated that matter can be converted to energy – and the same theory of
relativity which describes the boundaries of extracting energy from matter says that the
process can go both ways. If it is theoretically possible to make matter from energy –
and if we have learned how to make energy from matter – dare we be so arrogant as to
assume that only we are intelligent enough to ever be able to make matter from energy? Does the Bible answer the debate of what the universe was made from?

As a matter of fact, the great Apostle Paul – formerly known as Saul of Tarsus, a rising young star among the Jewish Pharisees during the first century – would say that scripture does answer that question.

He wrote, in Hebrews 11:3 (KJV); through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

While we are on that topic, notice that Paul – and the 16th – 17th century translators of
his words – clearly understood that the planets are more than just “lights in the sky” –
but that is a topic for another day!

Join us next time for more details of the Terra-Forming of Earth.

Be Blessed!

The Parson

19 thoughts on “Terra-Forming the Earth

  1. of course like your website but you need to take a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very troublesome to tell the truth nevertheless I will surely come back again.

    • Actually, I’m very careful about spelling. You must keep in mind that this site is created in the United States. There are at least four “Standard” spell checkers, for Australian English, UK English, Canadian English, and US English. Spelling on this site follows the US standard. If that offends you, I’m sorry – but I don’t apologize that I’m a citizen of the USA.

  2. Hello from Russia! Might it be possible for me to pages and use a submit in your weblog while using url to you? I’ve tried contacting you concerning this problem but it really seems i cant reach you, please response when possess a moment, thanks.

    • You aren’t stupid – I haven’t put them in. Go to the “comment” window at the end of a post, and at the extreme bottom, you can check boxes to be notified of new posts and / or of new comments. I don’t recommend checking the “new comments” box, as your mailbox will overflow. Of course, you always have the option of “unsubscribing” by clicking the appropriate link on any of those emails.

  3. naturally like your web-site but you have to test the spelling on several of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very troublesome to inform the truth however I’ll definitely come back again.

    • I have similar comments from time to time. I notice that you are in the UK. My word processor has four different English spell checkers, one each for UK, Australian, Canadian, and USA. NO, THEY ARE NOT THE SAME! I am a US citizen, and spellings on my site follow US standards. If that offends you, I’m sorry for the offense, but I DO NOT APOLOGIZE that I’m “American”.

  4. What I wouldnt give to have a debate with you about this. You just say so many things that come from nowhere that Im quite sure Id have a fair shot. Your weblog is wonderful visually, I mean people wont be bored. But others who can see past the videos and the layout wont be so impressed together with your generic understanding of this topic.

    • If you are serious about a debate, let’s do it right here. You accuse me of having a “generic understanding”, but in fact, your comment is quite generic. If you want to discuss specific topics, then BE SPECIFIC.

  5. I’m really glad I’ve found this information. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossips and net and this is actually annoying. A good website with interesting content, that is what I need. Thank you for keeping this web site, I will be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can’t find it.

  6. Pingback: Sermon

Leave a Reply